tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post2184473169208115219..comments2024-03-25T22:17:35.616+00:00Comments on Public Transport Experience: Oooh La La : C'est Le Tour de Yorkshire (Un)fatbusblokehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06833340546527596517noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-6447752764510160462017-04-07T08:39:21.311+01:002017-04-07T08:39:21.311+01:00Can I suggest that if anons don't like what th...Can I suggest that if anons don't like what they read they read something different? Anon (different to the other ones)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-60710393569281721232017-04-06T13:09:52.755+01:002017-04-06T13:09:52.755+01:00correction: the gender of one of the respondents.correction: the gender of one of the respondents.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-22315089328473671582017-04-06T13:08:19.968+01:002017-04-06T13:08:19.968+01:00Is FBB jumping the gun (three and a half weeks bef...Is FBB jumping the gun (three and a half weeks before the closure)? Possibly. Should the companies in question have told their customer services teams what operations clearly already know? Probably. Does it make sense to have all queries from your nationwide operations answered in Bedfordshire? Unlikely. Is it acceptable to name and shame people doing their job? Never. <br /><br />It brings nothing to the blog to name the people trying to "help" his "friends". Their "failure" to answer his "question" probably lies within the realms of the information they are given, not their own refusal to answer questions. It would be bad enough on a blog where the author's name is publicly available, and even worse on one hidden under a presumably amusing pseudonym. As if that wasn't bad enough, it is then followed by an equally unnecessary questioning of one of the recipients gender. What difference would that make to the whole affair, and why does "fbb" even care?<br /><br />Regardless of whether "all will be revealed tomorrow" or not, it is a far cry from what could be considered acceptable. <br /><br />(A different anon from those above, simply due to not having a named log-in, and not having any connection to the individuals concerned!)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-53696534303743725012017-04-06T12:32:57.724+01:002017-04-06T12:32:57.724+01:00You've crossed a line here naming and attackin...You've crossed a line here naming and attacking individuals in this way. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-70188051975995892042017-04-06T11:26:30.285+01:002017-04-06T11:26:30.285+01:00http://heretotherepublishing.com/h2toldsite/blog/?...http://heretotherepublishing.com/h2toldsite/blog/?p=1178 <br /><br />Read this for an insight into what FBB's real motivation is. Alan Johnsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-29394893265724471432017-04-06T11:22:31.728+01:002017-04-06T11:22:31.728+01:00If and when information is easily available will y...If and when information is easily available will you publish a full retraction? <br /><br />In the interests of fairness? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-87526781304216343512017-04-06T11:21:09.821+01:002017-04-06T11:21:09.821+01:00Well said.
Its a bored old man obsessed with the ...Well said.<br /><br />Its a bored old man obsessed with the sound of his own voice making a nuisance of himself under the guise of performing some kind of public service. Super Hansnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-27420613103559137592017-04-06T08:59:05.506+01:002017-04-06T08:59:05.506+01:00Whoops! Delete "not" in para 3.Whoops! Delete "not" in para 3.fatbusblokehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06833340546527596517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-87382983450063849252017-04-06T08:57:16.378+01:002017-04-06T08:57:16.378+01:00Quite right, Anonymous. The response of all concer...Quite right, Anonymous. The response of all concerned is appalling and very bad for the passengers and the future of the bus industry. As you will read on Monday, it <b>is</b> possible for smaller companies to do a good job with publicity and it should be even easier for the Stagecoaches of this world to do so as they have greater resources.<br /><br />If you read tomorrow's blog, you will see that full details of the arrangements are in hand and published. Sadly not published where anyone can easily find them and, presumably, not provided for Customer Service staff.<br /><br />If the bus company staff WERE hard working and/or well managed, this blog would not have been unnecessary.<br /><br />My only concern is for the passengers on April 30th who will, almost certainly, have no information that is easily available.fatbusblokehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06833340546527596517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7432323264902617108.post-40422448430245066292017-04-06T08:42:46.954+01:002017-04-06T08:42:46.954+01:00So, let me get this right. An aged blogger, who ha...So, let me get this right. An aged blogger, who has nothing better to do with his time than rubbish the efforts of bus operators, makes spurious enquiries of hard working bus company staff, who possibly don't yet have sufficient details of the road closures to know what their services will do, distracting them from their main work?<br />And the 'cherry on the top' is that he takes great delight in naming said operators. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com